HUMANITY FILES
Trail of Tears
The Forced Removal of the Cherokee Nation
Southeastern United States to Indian Territory · 1838–1839
Summary
Under the Indian Removal Act of 1830, the United States government forced the Cherokee Nation from its homeland in the Southeastern United States to Indian Territory (present-day Oklahoma) in 1838–1839. U.S. Army and state militia forces rounded some 16,000 Cherokee people into stockades before marching them roughly 1,000 miles; an estimated several thousand died of disease, starvation and exposure along the way.
Estimated Impact
Estimated deaths: approximately 4,000 of the roughly 16,000 Cherokee people forcibly removed, though historians' estimates range from about 2,000 to 8,000.
Why estimates vary
- Commonly cited historical estimate: approximately 4,000 deaths — Widely cited figure originating with 19th-century missionary and later historical accounts, used by the National Park Service's Trail of Tears National Historic Trail
- Lower and higher scholarly ranges: estimates in the historical literature range from roughly 2,000 to over 8,000 deaths — Cherokee Nation historical records; academic demographic reconstructions
No comprehensive contemporary count of deaths was kept during the removal itself; figures were reconstructed afterward from missionary accounts, army records, and Cherokee Nation records of the party sizes that arrived in Indian Territory compared to those that departed, with additional deaths occurring in stockades before departure and in the months after arrival that are inconsistently included across different estimates.
What Happened
The Indian Removal Act, signed into law by President Andrew Jackson in 1830, authorized the federal government to negotiate the relocation of Native American nations from the Southeastern United States to land west of the Mississippi River. The Cherokee Nation resisted removal through the U.S. legal system, winning a Supreme Court ruling in Worcester v. Georgia (1832) that affirmed Cherokee political sovereignty against Georgia state law — a ruling the Jackson administration did not enforce[1].
In 1835, a minority faction of Cherokee leaders, without authorization from the Cherokee National Council, signed the Treaty of New Echota, ceding Cherokee land in exchange for compensation and relocation. The U.S. government treated the treaty as binding on the entire Cherokee Nation[2]. When the majority of Cherokee people refused to leave voluntarily by the 1838 deadline, President Martin Van Buren ordered the U.S. Army, under General Winfield Scott, to enforce removal. Soldiers and state militia rounded up an estimated 16,000 Cherokee people into hastily built stockades, then marched or transported them roughly 1,000 miles west to Indian Territory over the following months, largely during the winter of 1838–1839, along routes that became known as the Trail of Tears[3].
Who Was Affected
The Cherokee Nation bore the direct impact of this removal; the same Indian Removal Act policy also displaced the Muscogee (Creek), Chickasaw, Choctaw and Seminole nations from the Southeast in the same period, each with its own documented removal history and casualties. Families were separated, property and livestock were seized or abandoned, and forced marchers faced exposure, inadequate food and water, and epidemic disease, particularly during the harsh winter conditions of the main 1838–1839 removal.
Who Was Responsible
Responsibility runs from the federal policy set by the Indian Removal Act and President Jackson’s administration, through the Treaty of New Echota negotiated without full Cherokee National Council authorization, to the U.S. Army units and state militia that carried out the roundup and march under General Winfield Scott’s command. State governments, particularly Georgia, which extended state jurisdiction over Cherokee land and land-lottery systems ahead of removal, were also central actors.
The Justification
Removal was publicly justified on several grounds advanced at the time: that separating Native and settler populations would reduce conflict, that western relocation would allow Native nations to govern themselves without state interference, and — reflecting the broader ideology of continental expansion later crystallized as “Manifest Destiny” — that white agricultural settlement of Cherokee land served the nation’s development. Jackson and Georgia state officials also argued, contrary to the Supreme Court’s Worcester ruling, that state law properly superseded Cherokee sovereignty within Georgia’s claimed borders.
Ideas Behind the File
The removal reflects the ideology of continental expansion later named Manifest Destiny, and draws on the older legal reasoning of the Doctrine of Discovery, which U.S. courts had used since the 1823 case Johnson v. M’Intosh to hold that Native nations retained only a right of occupancy over their land, subject to the superior title of the discovering European power and its successor, the United States.
Institutions
The U.S. Office of Indian Affairs (see Office of Indian Affairs), then housed within the War Department, administered federal Indian policy; the U.S. Army carried out the physical removal.
What Is Certain
That the Cherokee Nation was forcibly removed from its homeland under armed compulsion, that thousands died during the process, and that the Treaty of New Echota was signed without Cherokee National Council authorization, are all established by U.S. government records, Cherokee Nation records, and contemporary and scholarly accounts, and are not seriously disputed[2][3].
What Is Disputed
The precise death toll is not known with certainty and is reconstructed from incomplete records; estimates in the historical literature range from roughly 2,000 to over 8,000 deaths, depending on which stages of the removal (stockade confinement, the march itself, and the months immediately after arrival) are included in the count.
Human Consequences
Beyond the deaths, survivors experienced the loss of ancestral homeland, extensive property, and existing political and economic institutions built over generations in the Southeast, along with lasting cultural and intergenerational trauma documented in Cherokee oral history and later scholarship.
Accountability
No individual or institution was held legally accountable for the removal at the time; it was carried out as sanctioned federal policy. The U.S. government has never issued a formal reparative settlement specific to the Trail of Tears, though the National Park Service established the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail in 1987 to preserve and interpret the route, and Cherokee Nation and United Keetoowah Band institutions maintain their own historical and cultural documentation of the removal.
What Changed Afterward
The Trail of Tears became a foundational case in the later development of U.S. federal Indian law and policy debates, and is widely taught as a central example of forced displacement carried out under the combined pressure of treaty-based legal mechanisms and military enforcement — a pattern repeated in other removals discussed elsewhere in this archive, including Canadian Residential Schools.
Ideas Behind This File
Institutions
Sources & Evidence
Primary Sources
Reminiscence of Private John G. Burnett, 2nd Regiment, 2nd Brigade, Mounted Infantry
A soldier's first-person account of the removal, written decades after the events; treated here as testimony rather than a contemporaneous record.
Official Records
Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. 515
Held that the Cherokee Nation was a distinct political community with its own laws, into which Georgia state law could not extend — a ruling the Jackson administration did not enforce.
Treaty of New Echota
Signed by a minority faction without authorization from the Cherokee National Council, and used by the U.S. government as the legal basis for removal.
Records of the Bureau of Indian Affairs relating to Cherokee removal
Books
Trail of Tears: The Rise and Fall of the Cherokee Nation
The Cherokee Nation and the Trail of Tears
Last reviewed: January 15, 2025. Found an error? See our corrections policy.